Author: Wayne Parham

 

Seminars at LSAF 2018

Sunday, May 6th:

11:00am to 12:00 “It’s all about Relationships (Between your Equipment)”, by Barry Thornton
12:00 to 1:00pm “Tape History Seminar”, by Charles King    
1:00pm to 2:00pm “Crossover Electronics 101”, by Wayne Parham    
2:00pm to 3:00pm “Speaker Placement and Room Interactions”, by Todd Binnix
3:00pm to 4:00pm “Digital Audio Demystified”, by Steven Solazzo

“Stone Soup”

Stone Soup is a folk story that was passed by oral tradition for quite a long time. Several versions exist throughout Europe, all having a similar theme. The first written record of the story was published in 1720 in France by Madame de Noyer. But it is likely that the story passed orally down through the ages long before any written record was made.

Noyer’s version of the story is set in Normandy, northern France. Two Jesuits come to a farmhouse, but only the children are home. The Jesuits, who are hungry, convince the children that they are not begging for food, but in fact they are self-sufficient as they have a stone that makes soup. They tell the children that all they actually need is fire, a pot, and some water, and that their stone will do the rest.

In other versions of the story, soldiers come to a town and ask local villagers to participate in making their “stone soup.”

A fire is made ready, a pot put over, water is added, and the stone is dropped in. When the water is hot, each person is asked to contribute some small bit of food to the soup. This and that are added until, finally, a truly fabulous soup has been made. It is a story that always has a happy ending. Everyone always seems to have a good time making the soup, and the soup itself is always loved.

The moral of the story always seems to be that with cooperation and a little effort from everyone, a great task can be performed.

In modern times, we see this in the computer industry as “open-source” projects. The first open-source projects were mostly games and other “hobby” projects but before long, some pretty sophisticated software was being offered as open-source projects, including operating systems, compilers and other large scale complex systems.

The history of open-source computer software (and open standards in hardware too, for that matter) is actually pretty interesting, in my opinion. I’ll describe it, in brief:

In the early days of computing – back when computer systems filled rooms or even whole floors – people that had access to computers were so few that software was only used or even seen by a small number of people. It was often shared back then, without regard to intellectual property rights. There was a “natural boundary” that protected the intellectual property – very few people had access to computers, so there was very little need to protect the software. Almost nobody that might have copied it could have used it.

Back then, most software that wasn’t user-written was bundled with the hardware. The hardware manufacturer provided the operating system, languages and diagnostic tools with the system. But you could only get the software if you bought the hardware.

By the 1970s, minicomputers were much more popular, and microcomputers were on the horizon. So the stage was set for a need to address issues of intellectual property in the digital realm. By this time, computers were starting to become numerous enough that software developers began to sell their creations both to corporate users and private individuals.

Software was not considered copyrightable before the 1974 US Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works decided that computer programs, to the extent that they embody an author’s original creation, are proper subject matter of copyright. After that, software developers began to distribute their products in a way that resisted modification and copying, usually as compiled object code and often times with a hardware or software key. Software was often licensed rather than sold. This was the beginnings of “closed-source” proprietary software.

A similar but opposite reaction was the beginning of freeware, shareware and “open-source” software. In some ways, this was like the way things were before 1974, when programs weren’t copyrightable. Software made available like that was freely distributed and was sometimes called “freeware.” Other software was distributed with a notice asking for a donation, or sometimes provided in a limited version which could be “unlocked” after a donation was sent. Still another form is what we now call “open-source,” which is software that is made available for anyone to use – sometimes with restrictions on commercial use, sometimes not, depending on the open-source licensing model.

Open-source these days is very much like a “stone soup group.” It is placed in a central repository and made available to everyone. Even more significantly is the fact that the central repository can be modified by others. The repository is controlled by the product owner, which is usually the original author or originating team. They control access to anyone that might modify the code. In this way, the software is continually modified, improved and updated by people that are interested in the project. It is “policed” by the product owner, who reviews any potential updates before allowing them to be merged into the repository.

What is amazing to me is how the tech world has changed in the past few decades to embrace this model of software development. As I said above, in the 1980s, you really only saw games and small hobby programs distributed in an open arrangement. By the 2000s, there were a lot of sophisticated systems that were beginning to be distributed as open-source, including operating systems like Unix/Linux, databases like PostgreSQL and MySQL and popular languages like Java. But even still – in those days – companies would often refrain from using open-source software for fear of malfunction or “bugs.” When a corporation purchases proprietary software licenses, there is an expectation of support and a potential for liability mitigation. So corporate America was still largely run by proprietary code.

But not for long. I knew the world had turned when I saw IBM promoting Linux to its customers over its own version of Unix called AIX. This was around 2006. Prior to that, IBM wouldn’t even work on a machine that had open-source software on it. It was taboo – a potential loophole that might damage its own intellectual property rights. It did not want to risk the chance of litigation, so it always had a “Chinese wall” around any installation that might have open-source software on it. But by 2006, IBM embraced the open-source versions of Linux, and even promoted its use on its hardware. The world had indeed changed.

Now days, some of the most sophisticated systems are created, improved, distributed and supported by an open-source, “stone soup” model. The latest machine learning or “artificial intelligence” software is made available this way, as are many operating systems, computers languages, tools and even office applications like word processors and spreadsheets.

The Future of LSAF

As the founder of LSAF, many people approach me with comments about the direction of the Lonestar Audiofest.  Most everyone likes the show, and enjoys its intimate laid-back posture.  Some like the show just the way it is, and wouldn’t change a thing.  Others would prefer the show to grow a little bit, and some people wish it would grow a lot.  Of those that have come several years in a row, some make the observation that attendance waxes and wanes from year to year.

The Lonestar Audiofest has always been about audio and camaraderie with just a touch of commercialization.  I modeled it largely from other groups that are self-governing and self-supporting.  It was always intended to be informal and non-profit, so we do not have (or want) a budget for advertisement.  We operate by word-of-mouth.

This is on purpose.  We want the show to be cost-effective for small niche-market companies.  We want the DIY experts here.  They usually do not have large budgets, but they have lots of passion for their craft.  This show gives companies like that a place to gather each year for face time with prospective customers and for photo opportunities.  It opens them up to a wider audience.

We also like for the show to be informal and intimate.  There is enough interest to keep each room filled, but not so much activity that people can’t visit with one another and have doors-shut quiet time to listen to each system.  Attendees can actually have a one-on-one experience with the gear and with the designers.  This aspect makes the show attractive to all audio companies, regardless of their marketing budget.

An informal show like this naturally grows and shrinks over time.  I’ve seen this in other groups too.  Sometimes groups start small but grow.  Then a few years later, they shrink.  A few more years pass and the size swells again.

The core members of a group are what center and stabilize it.  We have a great central core at LSAF.  The same dozen or so companies that started it return every year.  One company may drop for a year for whatever reason and then be back the next year, but basically, the same dozen or so “founding” companies return every year.

We see a half-dozen to a dozen companies that are new each year, keeping it in-flux.  Sometimes there are more, sometimes less.  Some of these new upstart companies return, others don’t.  Some just don’t make it as a business.  Some companies want different things from an audio show.  Some try a different path or get sidetracked and then return several years later.  When they do, they find the same core companies supporting LSAF.

There are many regular supporters of LSAF that have helped over the years.  When I first moved the show from Tulsa to Dallas, some of the Texan regulars stepped up to help.  Fred Thompson, Jim Rivers and Bob Spence formed a sort of “steering committee.”  I did the negotiations with the hotel and maintained the website.  We also had regular exhibitors, like John Busch, Johan van Zyl, Bob Brines, Norman Tracy, Russ Gates and Duke LeJeune.  There are others that slip my mind, but those formed the core group that are still with us to this day.

In recent years, we’ve seen new regulars that I consider to be part of the core.  Some examples of this “new crew” are Pete Millett, David Thompson, Steven Solazzo and Joshua Miles, among others.  Each of these exhibitors bring world-class equipment, and I’m really glad to see them every year.  They are very active online, and they support the show both with regular attendance and by spreading the word.

Without a marketing department or even a budget for one, we’ve managed to have an advertisement in every April issue of AudioXpress since  2012.  We’ve had show coverage in Positive Feedback, Dagogo and Enjoy the Music as well as on pretty much every audio discussion board on the internet.  We’ve always managed to be noticed, and by the hits I’ve seen on AudioRoundTable.com, I can say with confidence that the online buzz is as loud as it is for the bigger shows.  I’ve been to them and gotten the same online traffic footprint from LSAF.  So even with the smaller laid-back show approach, the internet buzz is pretty hot.  But even if it weren’t, we’re all here for one reason.  We’re here because we love it.

To me, that’s what’s best about LSAF.  It’s sort of a “stone soup” group.  These core regular exhibitors will always be here, because they love to be here.  It’s a passion for us all, a break from the high-pressure shows, a place to show-up and setup where people are there to enjoy the systems and the friends we’ve made.

Related reading:

Ruminations

2017 Show Reports

A wave of deluge and tornadoes marched across the Midwest and South through the week preceding LSAF 2017. But suddenly, on Thursday, the weather cleared and remained beautiful throughout the show. Every room sounded great, with our usual eclectic mix of high-end and DIY audio. It was a great blend of camaraderie and beautiful music!

See the show reports at this and other previous shows:

We’re already starting planning for next year’s show.  One of the main things we’re talking about is bringing back the seminars, but doing them on Sunday instead of Saturday.  This ensures Saturday remains an uninterrupted listening day and also keeps the doors open all day Sunday!